Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
Abstract
Chromium (Cr+6) toxicity is a significant environmental stress factor that severely hampers plant growth and productivity. This study aimed to evaluate whether the combined application of phosphorus fertilizer and melatonin could alleviate chromium induced stress in maize (Zea mays L.). A foliar spray of melatonin (50 µM) was applied alongside two phosphorus sources—phosphoric acid (PA) and diammonium phosphate (DAP), each at 60% of the recommended rate. Two maize cultivars (FH-1046 and YH-1898) were grown under chromium stress (0, 15, and 30 mg kg–1) to assess treatment effects. The results demonstrated that FH-1046 plants treated with PA + melatonin under noncontaminated conditions showed a significantly higher transpiration rate (44%) compared to YH-1898 under chromium stress. Additionally, the combination of DAP + melatonin under 30 mg kg–1 Cr significantly improved fresh and dry biomass by 20% and 30%, respectively. These findings suggest that foliar-applied melatonin in combination with phosphorus fertilization can enhance physiological performance and biomass accumulation, offering a potential strategy to improve maize resilience and yield under chromium-contaminated soils.
Author ORCID Identifier
ZUNAIRA ZAFAR: 0009-0005-7691-7880
SHOAIB AHMAD: 0000-0002-5351-9100
MUHAMMAD AKHTAR: 0000-0003-1628-8910
SHAFAQAT ALI: 0000-0002-3773-5196
SARAH ALOMRANI: 0009-0003-9163-2416
MUHAMMAD ALSHEHRI: 0000-0002-0188-1634
DOI
10.55730/1300-011X.3350
Keywords
Melatonin, maize, chromium, gas exchange parameters, growth parameters
First Page
262
Last Page
275
Publisher
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK)
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
ZAFAR, Z, AHMAD, S, AKHTAR, M, ALI, S, ALOMRANI, S. O, & ALSHEHRI, M. A (2026). Ameliorating chromium-induced stress in Maize through phosphorus and melatonin application. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 50 (3): 262-275. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3350