Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Background/aim: Perioperative FLOT is considered the gold standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, in the adjuvant setting, chemotherapy intolerance has brought de-escalation strategies to the forefront as an important area of research. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of adjuvant FLOT and FOLFOX regimens in enhancing survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection following neoadjuvant FLOT treatment.
Materials and methods: Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT2-4, N0-3) who received four cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT and subsequently underwent surgery at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2018 and September 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were compared to patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX or FLOT. Clinical variables such as disease stage and response to neoadjuvant therapy were also analyzed to determine their impact on DFS and OS.
Results: The analysis included 171 patients, with a median age of 59 years and a median follow-up duration of 16.1 months. At 16 months, the DFS and OS rates were 66% and 82%, respectively. Of the 171 patients, 105 received adjuvant FLOT, 37 received FOLFOX, and 29 received no adjuvant therapy. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in DFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30–1.33, p = 0.229) or OS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24–2.37, p = 0.635) between the FLOT and FOLFOX groups. However, the advanced disease stage and lack of pathological response to neoadjuvant FLOT were associated with decreased DFS and OS, highlighting these factors as potential prognostic indicators.
Conclusion: Among patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant FLOT, adjuvant FOLFOX showed comparable efficacy to FLOT, suggesting its potential as an alternative option, particularly for patients with deteriorated ECOG PS or those who developed chemotherapy intolerance postoperatively. These findings inform treatment strategies and optimize adjuvant therapy selection based on individual patient profiles.
Author ORCID Identifier
FURKAN CEYLAN: 0000-0002-1944-0861
DİDEM ŞENER DEDE: 0000-0002-9756-5942
SAFA CAN EFİL: 0000-0001-9586-2858
ATEŞ TENEKECİ: 0009-0007-6224-945X
EREN CEYLAN: 0009-0003-1244-4530
SERHAT SEKMEK: 0000-0003-4650-248X
MEHMET ÇAKMAK: 0000-0002-5362-6109
BURAK BİLGİN: 0000-0003-1717-8246
ŞEBNEM YÜCEL: 0000-0001-6235-7927
HAYRİYE TATLI DOĞAN: 0000-0003-4318-2775
MEHMET ALİ ŞENDUR: 0000-0001-7021-6139
MUHAMMED AKINCI: 0000-0001-7575-9925
DOĞAN UNCU: 0000-0002-0929-3271
BÜLENT YALÇIN: 0000-0002-4431-8948
DOI
10.55730/1300-0144.6002
Keywords
FLOT, FOLFOX, Gastric cancer, response, Survival
First Page
547
Last Page
558
Publisher
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK)
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
CEYLAN, F, ŞENER DEDE, D, EFİL, S, TENEKECİ, A. K, CEYLAN, E. G, SEKMEK, S, ÇAKMAK, M, BİLGİN, B, YÜCEL, Ş, TATLI DOĞAN, H, ŞENDUR, M. N, AKINCI, M. B, UNCU, D, & YALÇIN, B (2025). Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX vs. FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 55 (3): 547-558. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6002