Urologists’ opinion on treating asymptomatic stones: Would we treat ourselves as we treat our patients? Survey from European Association of Urology, Young AcademicUrologists, Endourology and Urolithiasis working party

Authors

Tarık Emre ŞENERFollow
Thomas TAILLYFollow
Yılören TANIDIRFollow
Etienne Xavier KELLERFollow
Amelia PIETROPAOLOFollow
Juan Gomez RIVASFollow
Zeeshan HAMEEDFollow
Vincent De CONINCKFollow
Tzevat TEFİKFollow
Kemal SARICAFollow
Ali Serdar GÖZENFollow
Andreas SKOLARIKOSFollow
Olivier TRAXERFollow
Christian SEITZFollow
Bhaskar SOMANIFollow

DOI

10.55730/1300-0144.5779

Abstract

Management of asymptomatic kidney stones is an ongoing debate with follow-up and treatment guidelines based on low-level evidence. Our aim was to evaluate current management of asymptomatic urinary stones.Materials and methods: A 70-question survey was designed in collaboration with European Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Section of Uro-Technology and Section of Urolithiasis groups and distributed. Responders filled out hypothetical scenarios from 2 perspectives, either as treating physicians, or as patients themselves.Results: A total of 212 (40.01%) responses were obtained. Median responder age was 39 years. 75% of responders were interested in “urolithiasis”. 82.5% had never experienced a renal colic, 89.6% had never undergone urolithiasis treatment.Overall, as the kidney stone scenarios got more complicated, the invasiveness of the treatment preference increased. As “the physician”, responders preferred the conservative option in all situations more than they would choose as “the patient”. For ureteral stones, conservative approach was most preferred for small stones and ureteroscopy became more preferred as the stone size increased.For smaller kidney stones, the most preferred follow-up schedule was 4-6 monthly, whereas for larger and complicated stones it was 0-3 monthly from both perspectives respectively. For all ureteral stone scenarios, 0-4 weekly follow-up was mostly preferred.Interestingly, having had a renal colic was an independent predictor of an interventional approach, whereas having had an intervention was an independent predictor of a conservative approach.Conclusion: Current treatment and follow-up patterns of asymptomatic urinary stones are in agreement with international guidelines on symptomatic stones.In most of the urolithiasis situations urologists chose a conservative approach for their patients compared to what they would prefer for themselves. Conversely, urologists, in the scenarios as “the patient”, would like to have a more frequent follow-up schedule for theirstones compared to how they would follow-up their patients.

Keywords

Urolithiasis, survey, decision making, kidney, ureter

First Page

185

Last Page

193

Recommended Citation

ŞENER, Tarık Emre; TAILLY, Thomas; TANIDIR, Yılören; KELLER, Etienne Xavier; PIETROPAOLO, Amelia; RIVAS, Juan Gomez; HAMEED, Zeeshan; CONINCK, Vincent De; TEFİK, Tzevat; SARICA, Kemal; GÖZEN, Ali Serdar; SKOLARIKOS, Andreas; TRAXER, Olivier; SEITZ, Christian; and SOMANI, Bhaskar (2024) "Urologists’ opinion on treating asymptomatic stones: Would we treat ourselves as we treat our patients? Survey from European Association of Urology, Young AcademicUrologists, Endourology and Urolithiasis working party," Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences: Vol. 54: No. 1, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5779
Available at: https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/vol54/iss1/21