Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
DOI
10.3906/sag-1404-182
Abstract
Background/aim: Although common bile duct stones are generally treated endoscopically, surgery is required if endoscopic removal is impossible. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical options in such patients. Materials and methods: A total of 282 patients with common bile duct stones underwent open choledochotomy; primary closure was applied in 48 (17.0%), primary closure with T-tube drainage in 81 (28.7%), and choledochoduodenostomy in 153 (54.3%) patients. Results: Postoperative complications were seen in 8 (16.7%) patients in the primary closure, 33 (40.7%) patients in the primary closure with T-drainage, and 37 (24.2%) patients in the choledochoduodenostomy group. No significant differences were observed among the groups (P > 0.05). The mean postoperative hospital stays in the primary closure, primary closure with T-tube drainage, and choledochoduodenostomy groups were 5.5, 13.5, and 8.9 days, respectively. The mean postoperative hospitalization was significantly shorter in the primary closure group than in the other groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Primary closure is a safe and feasible method in selected patients.
Keywords
Primary closure, T-tube drainage, choledochoduodenostomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
First Page
283
Last Page
286
Recommended Citation
AYDINLI, BÜLENT; ÖZTÜRK, GÜRKAN; ATAMANALP, SABRİ SELÇUK; ÖZOĞUL, BÜNYAMİ; ARSLAN, ŞÜKRÜ; KORKUT, ERCAN; KISAOĞLU, ABDULLAH; KANTARCI, ABDULMECİT; PİRİMOĞLU, RÜSTEM BERHAN; YILDIRGAN, MEHMET İLHAN; and AKSUNGUR, NURHAK
(2016)
"How to close open choledochotomy: primary closure, primary closurewith T-tube drainage, or choledochoduodenostomy?,"
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences: Vol. 46:
No.
2, Article 6.
https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1404-182
Available at:
https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/vol46/iss2/6