Antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk patients with hematologic malignancy:a comparison of practice with guidelines in Türkiye

Authors

ÖZLEM GÜZEL TUNÇCANFollow
SEÇKİN ÇAĞIRGANFollow
HAKAN ÖZDOĞUFollow
SİNEM CİVRİZ BOZDAĞFollow
FİLİZ VURALFollow
MUSTAFA PEHLİVANFollow
HÜSEYİN SAFFET BEKÖZFollow
YASEMİN ESENFollow
TUBA KOÇFollow
PETEK GİLİKFollow
ESİN ŞENOLFollow

Abstract

Background/aim: Primary antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) is recommended by guidelines as the gold standard for patients with hematologic malignancies. This study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge and translation of guideline recommendations into real-life setting among physicians in Türkiye.Materials and methods: In this prospective, observational study, the physicians’ knowledge of ΑFP guideline recommendations in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing first remission-induction (Group I), and graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplant (Group II), was compared with clinical practice via 11-item multiple-choice questionnaire evaluating the timing and patients in whom AFP was initiated, with AFP duration and drugs used.Results: The mean age was 48.3 years and 79% had AML/MDS. AFP was initiated in 75.3% of Group I patients on the first day of induction chemotherapy before baseline and in 26.2% of Group II patients at baseline. In 98.8% of AML/MDS patients, AFP was planned to be continued until recovery from neutropenia and complete remission, whereas during immunosuppression in Group II. The median (IQR) duration of AFP was 0.8 (0.5 - 1.9) and 5.5 (2.4 - 8.1) months in Group I and II, respectively. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs) were observed in 35.8% and 14.3% of Group I and II, respectively.The mean survey scores were 8.5 ± 2.3 points in AML/MDS, and 9.9 ± 3.2 in GvHD patient groups. Most of the sites adhered to European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) Guideline (80.6%), followed by Infectious Diseases Society of America, Fever and Neutropenia Guideline (IDSA) recommendations (51.6%). Posaconazole was the drug of choice in both groups (96.8% in Group I vs. 71% in Groups II).Conclusion: The data indicate an inconsistency between real-life clinical practice and guideline recommendations for primary AFP and bIFI management in high-risk patients with hematologic malignancies in Türkiye.

Author ORCID Identifier

ÖZLEM GÜZEL TUNÇCAN: 0000-0003-1611-0725

SEÇKİN ÇAĞIRGAN: 0000-0002-7579-5624

HAKAN ÖZDOĞU: 0000-0002-8902-1283

SİNEM CİVRİZ BOZDAĞ: 0000-0001-8359-7794

FİLİZ VURAL: 0000-0003-3489-296X

MUSTAFA PEHLİVAN: 0000-0002-6692-085X

HÜSEYİN BEKÖZ: 0000-0003-1237-8281

YASEMİN ESEN: 0009-0004-2047-6521

TUBA KOÇ: 0009-0004-0097-2376

PETEK GİLİK: 0009-0003-0029-7895

ESİN ŞENOL: 0000-0003-1535-2757

DOI

10.55730/1300-0144.5942

Keywords

antifungal agents, antifungal prophylaxis, graft-versus-host-disease, hematologic malignancy, Invasive fungal infections

First Page

52

Last Page

64

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Recommended Citation

GÜZEL TUNÇCAN, ÖZLEM; ÇAĞIRGAN, SEÇKİN; ÖZDOĞU, HAKAN; CİVRİZ BOZDAĞ, SİNEM; VURAL, FİLİZ; PEHLİVAN, MUSTAFA; BEKÖZ, HÜSEYİN SAFFET; ESEN, YASEMİN; KOÇ, TUBA; GİLİK, PETEK; and ŞENOL, ESİN (2025) "Antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk patients with hematologic malignancy:a comparison of practice with guidelines in Türkiye," Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences: Vol. 55: No. 1, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5942
Available at: https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/vol55/iss1/6